Cheah18 wrote:I'm glad people liked my thread
Lol.
Cheah18 wrote:I'm glad people liked my thread
That Torpid Gamer wrote:I don't think scouts are fine just because rangers make better snipers.
The problem with scouts isn't that they're so wow, amazing totally OP as a unit with their snipers, instead the problem lies in how cheaply they can transition from being dirt-cheap super-fast capping units, while ALSO being able to transition into an anti-melee unit.
Vindicare Assassin
Rangers
Scouts
They have the shotgunblast across the map without the upgrade...sk4zi wrote:the 10 power upgrade makes them kind of both scout variants, means you get the kb on demand from the high powered shot and the damage, anti garrison, high range, high sight radius, detection ...
Buying snipers versus Eldar is just the same as throwing resources to their face. And you want to upgrade them even more?saltychipmunk wrote:As long the scouts can bleed guardians without getting shot by rangers the other two upgrades just are not needed. admittedly vs good eldar players the stealth tends to be mandatory
Comparing default scouts to rangers °_O mkay... Upgraded scouts cost more than rangers and only do about half the dps and have nowhere near as much utility as the rangers have. Shotgunblast across the map. And their upgrade makes them able to infiltrate allies. Just, mind being blown here.That Torpid Gamer wrote:Default scouts are nowhere near as powerful as rangers but they cost nowhere as much and are faster too. Who buys default scouts to counter enemy set-up teams? I bet that's done very very rarely, often you would just upgrade an existing one.
take 2 shots to kill a fully upgraded scout due to various factors.
Ace of Swords wrote:the rangers target the sarge only if it's the closer model and no one else is in range
Arbit wrote:Also, why accuse him of lying? Why insult people? Why do SM players have to crank the drama to 11?
Ace of Swords wrote:take 2 shots to kill a fully upgraded scout due to various factors.
Why lie though?
The only time this happens is when you hit the sarge, and the rangers target the sarge only if it's the closer model and no one else is in range, and that almost never happens, unless you Attack move, but in that case you are most likely to hit something different from scouts.
Firts of all, the truth is not an insult. Since when is Ace a "SM-player" Can everyone stop calling anyone who even tries to argue about SM's a SM-fanboi? It's getting really old. Is everyone scared that SM might actually get a chance of being competitive?Arbit wrote:Also, why accuse him of lying? Why insult people? Why do SM players have to crank the drama to 11?
Partially revealed damage won't be in play because the rangers DETECT!David-CZ wrote:Having scouts infiltrated is one factor due to 'partially revealed' damage reduction. Then there's damage reduction granted by the squad leader. Also two types of cover. And a chance of hitting the sergeant or not hitting the target at all.
...
Also I don't lie. If I don't tell the truth because I'm not aware of it, then sorry.
Rangers have detect radius of 40 and weapon range of 55 if I'm not mistaken. So partial detection is in play during some situations.Dark Riku wrote:Partially revealed damage won't be in play because the rangers DETECT!
There is no such thing as damage reduction for squad leaders!
Cover doesn't do anything versus snipers! They are snipers! (Only shields stop sniper shots.)
Snipers hit all the time! 100% accuracy!
Sigh...
The way I see it, lying is an intentional act of not telling the truth or twisting it. So no, the quote is not a lie.Dark Riku wrote:So in your book if people think it's true it's not a lie?
"I think the earth is flat people! I really do! Hey i'm not lying you know! I think it is the truth!
See how that doesn't work?
Return to “Balance Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests